Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins: The 1972 Funds That Made Technology Venture Capital an Industry
Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins institutionalized a repeatable model for financing young technology companies, helping turn Silicon Valley venture investing into an industry.
1972 marked a shift from occasional technology investing to dedicated venture firms
Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins were both founded in 1972, when venture capital was still a small profession and Silicon Valley itself was a new label. The Computer History Museum identifies the two firms as “collaborative competitors” that emerged when only a handful of venture capitalists were operating.[1] Their significance was not that they invented risk capital. Earlier investors such as American Research and Development had already backed technology startups. The 1972 firms helped make venture investing a repeatable local institution tied closely to semiconductor and computer entrepreneurship.
The investment product was a portfolio, not one company
A venture fund spreads risk across many startups, allowing a few extraordinary winners to offset failures that would be unacceptable in a conventional lending portfolio.
Sequoia began with a small fund and a strong operating network
Sequoia’s own history says Don Valentine founded the firm in 1972 with a first $3 million fund and used it to back companies including Apple and Atari.[2] The amount was tiny by modern venture standards, but that was part of the model’s power. A relatively small pool of institutional capital could buy meaningful ownership in young companies before their markets were obvious, while the investor contributed recruiting, introductions, governance and commercial judgment.
Kleiner Perkins brought semiconductor operating experience into venture formation
The Computer History Museum’s “Fairchildren” history traces Kleiner Perkins to Fairchild cofounder Eugene Kleiner and Hewlett-Packard executive Tom Perkins and notes that the firm focused on early-stage high-technology companies.[3] The founders were not distant financiers. They came from the operating culture of electronics and understood technical teams, product cycles and manufacturing risk. That background helped make venture capital a specialized craft rather than generic small-business lending.
Industry expertise reduced information asymmetry
Technology startups are difficult to evaluate from financial statements alone. Investors with engineering and operating backgrounds could judge teams and technical markets before conventional metrics existed.
The 1972 founding date does not mean every fund closed on the same day
Historical accounts distinguish the formation of the firms from the closing dates of individual limited partnerships. Research on Silicon Valley venture capital notes that Kleiner and Perkins formed their firm in 1972 while early fund-raising continued through the decade.[4] That nuance matters because the real innovation was institutional. Dedicated partnerships created vehicles through which outside limited partners could commit capital for long periods while general partners selected and governed risky startups.
Sand Hill Road concentrated capital, talent and information
The firms’ physical proximity to semiconductor companies, Stanford and one another created a dense financing market. CHM’s venture history emphasizes that early firms shared information and sometimes collaborated on deals even while competing.[1] This reduced search costs for founders and investors. Entrepreneurs knew where to seek capital, while venture firms gained access to a steady flow of technical talent leaving established companies.
Geographic clustering created a financing network effect
As more founders, lawyers, recruiters and investors concentrated in one region, each additional participant made the market more efficient for everyone else.
Public policy later multiplied the amount of capital the model could absorb
The National Venture Capital Association’s history explains that changes to pension-investment rules and capital-gains policy in the late 1970s expanded the capital available to venture funds.[5] Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins therefore arrived before the industry had access to the enormous institutional pools that later powered it. Their early performance helped demonstrate that technology portfolios could justify those allocations.
The returns were measured in new companies and a new asset class
The firms later backed companies across personal computing, biotechnology, networking, software and the Internet. Their individual deals generated returns, but the deeper economic return was institutional replication. Hundreds of venture firms adopted similar limited-partnership structures, board involvement, staged financing and specialization. Technology entrepreneurship acquired a dedicated capital market rather than relying on corporate sponsorship or wealthy individuals.
Successful financial institutions are copied as aggressively as technologies
Once the venture model showed that concentrated technical risk could produce exceptional portfolio returns, capital and talent flowed into new funds using similar structures.
Why the 1972 venture firms were investments in an investment system
Sequoia and Kleiner Perkins belong in computing investment history because they helped build the financial infrastructure that repeatedly funded later waves of innovation. Their early funds were small relative to the companies and venture pools that followed, but they established relationships, incentives and operating practices that made high-risk technology financing scalable.
The compounding effect is visible throughout later CH800 batches. Apple, Atari, Sun, Electronic Arts, Google and many other companies depended on a venture ecosystem that could identify technical teams before public markets were ready to finance them. The most profound return from the 1972 firms was therefore not one spectacular investment. It was the creation of a durable mechanism for making thousands of future technology investments possible.
Works Cited
- 01Computer History Museum — The Next New Thing: Venture Capital Stories computerhistory.org
- 02Sequoia Capital — Our History sequoiacap.com
- 03Computer History Museum — Fairchildren computerhistory.org
- 04
- 05
CodeHistory is a living archive. Citations document the evidence used for this edition; later evidence may refine the account.
Submit a research lead